Does Studying Ethics Affect Moral Views? An Application to Distributive Justice

نویسنده

  • James Konow
چکیده

Recent years have witnessed a rapid increase in initiatives to expand ethics instruction in higher education. Numerous empirical studies have examined the possible effects on students of discipline-based ethics instruction, such business ethics and medical ethics. Nevertheless, the largest share of college ethics instruction has traditionally fallen to philosophy departments, and there is a paucity of empirical research on the individual effects of that approach. This paper examines possible effects of exposure to readings and lectures in mandatory philosophy classes on student views of morality. Specifically, it focuses on an ethical topic of importance to both economics and philosophy, viz., economic (or distributive) justice. The questionnaire study is designed to avoid features suspected of generating false positives in past research while calibrating the measurement so as to increase the likelihood of detecting even a modest true effect. The results provide little evidence that the philosophical ethics approach studied here systematically affects the fairness views of students. The possible implications for future research and for ethics instruction are briefly discussed. Acknowledgements: I wish to thank Jim Hanink, Joe Earley, Hauke Jelschen and Thomas Herndon for assistance with the data collection or analysis. I am also grateful for very helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier related paper from Colin Camerer, C. Monica Capra, Uri Gneezy, Astri Hole, John Ifcher, Hartmut Kliemt, Jack Knetsch, Alexander Koch, Erzo F.P. Luttmer, Stephan Meier, Axel Ockenfels, Tommaso Reggiani, Eric Schwitzgebel, Erte Xiao, and seminar participants at Aarhus University, Caltech, Claremont Graduate University, the Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Santa Clara University, and the University of California, San Diego.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The norm of distributive Justice and its relation to fairness and equity with an emphasis on Imam Ali`s governmental ethic

As is understood by governmental ethics, governors should distribute possibilities and economical and social opportunities among citizens according to distributive justice. In this paper, the author, surveying and criticizing the views in the field, has shown that the type of work, need and public equality taken as norms in the views, may be counted as the ways for recognizing personal rights n...

متن کامل

Human rights and distributive justice in health care delivery.

This paper was first presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Christian Ethics, Toronto School of Theology, Toronto, Ontario in January 1977. Robert Shelton aims to focus on the concept of 'right to health care,' its related principle, 'distributive justice' in an attempt to suggest 'where we are' at present and where we perhaps ought to be heading. The paper is divided into t...

متن کامل

The Diversity of Objections to Inequality

goal-conformity to a certain pattern-to which special moral value is auached.2 I will begin by distinguishing what seem to me to be the fundamental moral reasons lying behind our objections to various forms of inequality. I will then illustrate these ideas by showing how they figure in various ways in Rawls's views about distributive justice. Finally, I will return to examine one of these value...

متن کامل

Criminal Abolition and its Impact on Justice as an Ethical Component

Background: Abolitionism has been one of the most influential ideas in criminal law in recent decades. Abolitionism is based on the belief in a moral conviction that life in the community cannot, in fact, be effectively regulated by criminal law, and that the role of the criminal justice system must be significantly reduced, while others have a chance to deal with problem situations, unfinished...

متن کامل

Distributive and Retributive Desert in Rawls

John Rawls rejects prejusticial conceptions of distributive desert on the grounds that such conceptions are immoral and impractical. Prejusticial understandings of desert claim that desert can be understood prior to and independently of justice in social institutions, and take legitimate desert claims to provide standards for evaluating social arrangements. Some philosophers have interpreted Ra...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016